z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The genetic structure of crossbills suggests rapid diversification with little niche conservatism
Author(s) -
Björklund Mats,
Alonso Daniel,
Edelaar Pim
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/bij.12097
Subject(s) - biology , niche , ecological niche , ecology , population , reproductive isolation , diversification (marketing strategy) , evolutionary biology , taxon , demography , marketing , sociology , habitat , business
Conservatism of ecological niches can cause geographical ranges or the formation of new species to be constrained, and might be expected in situations where strong trade‐offs result in ecological specialization. Here we address the flexibility of resource use in E uropean crossbills by comparing the ecological and genetic similarities between four M editerranean and three northern E uropean crossbill populations, all specialized in feeding on a different resource. We used sequence data of one mitochondrial and two nuclear genes from between 211 and 256 individuals. The northern crossbills were genetically too similar to infer which population was more related to the southern ones. Crossbills from the island of M allorca showed genetic signatures of a stable and isolated population, supporting their past treatment as a locally (co)evolving taxon, and seem to have evolved from an ecologically distinct ancestor. Previous studies in other populations also suggest that genetic similarity does not predict morphological and resource similarity. We estimate that the divergence of all western E uropean crossbills has occurred within the last 11 000 years. Overall, it appears that crossbills can diversify rapidly and with little niche conservatism, but that such potentially reproductively isolated specialists are evolutionarily short‐lived. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2013, 109 , 908–922.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here