Premium
Irreconcilable times
Author(s) -
Mookherjee Nayanika
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of the royal anthropological institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.62
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1467-9655
pISSN - 1359-0987
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9655.13760
Subject(s) - redress , ideology , sociology , harmony (color) , injustice , impunity , history , aesthetics , law , political science , philosophy , politics , art , visual arts
In Denktagebuch ( Thought diary , 1950‐73), Hannah Arendt wrote that acts which cannot be forgiven are beyond punishment and hence cannot be reconciled to. In this essay, I draw from Arendt to further theorize and extend the concept of irreconciliation. I draw together ethnographic material, historical material, documents, media reports, and reviews during this era of irreconcilability which includes Black Lives Matter; the memorialization debates on the removal of statues of enslavers; the history of slavery in the United Kingdom; and the ‘harmony ideology’ experienced by BAME (Black, Asian, and minority ethnic) academics within UK organizations linked to long‐term discrimination. I argue for the concept of irreconciliation as a bulwark against impunity, against a ‘window‐dressed’, symbolic performance of redress, and to be able to echo Arendt's words that ‘this’ – any original cause of injustice – ‘ought never to have happened’.