
The Doomsday Argument and the Number of Possible Observers
Author(s) -
Olum Ken D.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.095
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9213
pISSN - 0031-8094
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9213.00260
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , epistemology , philosophy , medicine
If the human race comes to an end relatively shortly, then we have been born at a fairly typical time in the history of humanity; if trillions of people eventually exist, then we have been born in the first surprisingly tiny fraction of all people. According to the ‘doomsday argument’ of Carter, Leslie, Gott and Nielsen, this means that the chance of a disaster which would obliterate humanity is much larger than usually thought. But treating possible observers in the same way as those who actually exist avoids this conclusion: our existence is more likely in a race which is long‐lived, and this cancels out the doomsday argument, so that the chance of a disaster is only what one would ordinarily estimate.