English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ATE customers are increasingly viewing a tester that does not facilitate easy and consistent access to the test data as a barrier to their profitability. The data is needed towards various ends like, Statistical Post Processing (SPP) for Die Binning, Reliability improvement, Burn-in Elimination [16], Process/Yield Improvement, Adaptive Control, Product Characterization, Test Floor Statistical Process Control (SPC), Calibration & Test Repeatability [10] to name a few. Subcontractor & Foundry manufacturing have only increased the complexity of the task. The main premise of this paper is that: "Taking the measurement" is the ATE vendor's expertise, "Evaluating the measurement" is the customer's expertise and we have a proposal to clear the confusion and maximize the ROI of test. The paper discusses the current "state-of-theart" in terms of data collection, illustrates the windfall of benefits reaped from utilizing the ATE data and presents a proposal on how to improve the situation.

ATE Data Collection - A comprehensive requirements proposal to maximize ROI of test