z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Power-Management Strategies in sEMG Wireless Body Sensor Networks Based on Computation Allocations: A Case Study for Fatigue Assessments
Author(s) -
Pin-Chang Chen,
Shanq-Jang Ruan,
Ya-Wen Tu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
ISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2020.3028706
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
Surface ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) is widely applied to a variety of applications. Managing the power consumption of battery-constrained sEMG Wireless Body Sensor Networks (WBSN) is an important topic. In this paper, we use fatigue assessments as a case study. We apply the concept of distributed computing to explore the impact of computation allocations on the client power consumption and the requirement of architecture specifications. Regarding the CPU clock rate, we propose a power-saving method based on the ping-pong buffer mechanism and evaluate all the crucial factors which affect the power consumption such as sEMG sample rates, algorithmic computational costs, wireless throughputs, and selection of wireless technologies. To sum up, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of all possible distributed computing architectures of WBSN to determine the lowest-power WBSN architecture. The results show that the implementation based on the lowest-power WBSN architecture has lower power consumption compared with other hardwares. The average current of the proposed architecture can be reduced by 81.7% compared with the previous work. Besides, the battery life is 4.48 times that of the previous work under the continuous wireless connection equipped with the same 300mAh lithium battery. Compared with the commercial device, the battery life is 1.6 times that of the commercial one.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom