z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Proposal for Optimization of Spool Valve Flow Force Based on the MATLAB-AMESim-FLUENT Joint Simulation Method
Author(s) -
Chen Qianpeng,
Ji Hong,
Zhu Yi,
Yang Xubo
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
ISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2018.2846589
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
This paper focuses on the open-center multi-way valve used in loader buckets. To solve the problem of excessive flow force that leads to spool clamping in the reset process, joint simulations adopting MATLAB, AMESim, and FLUENT were carried out. Boundary conditions play a decisive role in the results of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. However, the boundary conditions of valve ports depend on the hydraulic system's working condition and are significantly impacted by the port area, which has always been neglected. This paper starts with the port area calculation method, then the port area curves are input into the simulation hydraulic system, obtaining the flow curves of valve port as output, which are then applied as the boundary conditions of the spool valve CFD simulation. Therefore, the steady-state flow force of the spool valve is accurately calculated, and the result verifies the hypothesis that excess flow force causes spool clamping. Based on this, four kinds of structures were introduced in an attempt to improve the situation, and simulating calculation and theoretical analysis were adopted to verify the effects of improvement. Results show that the four structures could reduce the peak value of flow force by 17.8%, 60.6%, 61.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. Of the four, structures II, III, and IV can reduce the peak value of flow force to below reset spring force value, thus successfully avoiding the spool clamping caused by flow force.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom