z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Software Application for Survey Form Design and Processing for Scientific Use
Author(s) -
Seng Cheong Loke,
Khairul Azhar Kasmiran,
Sharifah Azizah Haron
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
ISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2017.2719284
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
A form processing application (FPA) automates digitization of information contained in forms. Smaller research groups do not use FPAs as they cannot justify operation of an in-house commercial system. This paper describes the design and testing of a new FPA that is targeted toward the needs of this group, and is released as free open-source software. The new FPA covers form design, printing, scanning, and digitization. It has a flexible plug-in architecture and double-keying is used to reduce transcription error. A common content module (CCM) implements the form design based on the format-independent hierarchical content. The scan module has basic handwriting recognition and can process the input fields used by the CCM. The FPA was field-tested using data from a clinical study to compare the error rate with manual processing. A similar comparison was also made between interviewer and self-administered survey forms. The first comparison shows that the FPA with double-keying had no errors while manual transcription had three errors (0.06%) out of 4952 input fields (p=0.083). The second comparison shows that the FPA with double-keying had no errors for the interviewer-administered form (0/3681 fields, 0%), while the self-administered form had three errors (3/6096 fields, 0.05%) (p=0.178). When double-keying was not used, the error rate for tablet-type fields was not significantly different (p=0.120) between the interviewer (2/3400 fields, 0.06%) and self-administered forms (19/6000 fields, 0.32%). There was, however, a highly significant difference (p<;0.001) for handwriting-type fields between the interviewer (11/881 fields, 1.25%) and self-administered forms (75/1896 fields, 3.96%).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom