The other side of projects: the case for critical project studies
Author(s) -
Damian Hodgson,
Svetlana Cicmil
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
international journal of managing projects in business
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.739
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1753-8386
pISSN - 1753-8378
DOI - 10.1108/17538370810846487
Subject(s) - instrumentalism , originality , sociology , mainstream , context (archaeology) , value (mathematics) , critical management studies , work (physics) , politics , order (exchange) , public relations , engineering ethics , epistemology , political science , social science , qualitative research , engineering , business , computer science , mechanical engineering , paleontology , philosophy , machine learning , law , biology , finance
Purpose – The purpose of this research note is to articulate the limitations that project management (PM) currently faces by outlining the PM literature's frequent neglect of political, social and ethical dimensions of PM work in order to raise a number of important themes that can be usefully integrated into mainstream PM literature.Design/methodology/approach – Extensive research note which updates us on where PM research is heading.Findings – PM is a highly complex, political and social process. The paper challenges readers, PM academics and practitioners to view PM more critically and to expand their appreciation of PM work as being more complex in its social context that merely delivering instrumentalist and mechanistic functional management processes.Originality/value – This paper triggers a debate using critical PM research to engage with all levels of the project hierarchy with the aim of initiating some transformation in how actors perceive themselves, their voice, their broad responsibility and ...
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom