Dynamical theory of X‐ray diffraction. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography No. 11. Pp. xviii + 661. By André Authier. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Price GBP 95.00. ISBN 0‐19‐855960‐7.

The story of dynamical diffraction is a curious one. Shortly after Laue's discovery of the diffraction of X-rays, the Braggs measured, and explained in simple concepts, the diffraction of monochromatic X-rays from single crystals. They observed diffraction behavior predicted by dynamical diffraction theory which was fully explained by C. G. Darwin. In fact, Ewald's ®rst theory of dynamical diffraction actually preceded the discovery of X-ray diffraction and, even more remarkably, was an instrument that helped lead to that discovery. This historical oddity arises from P. P. Ewald's PhD thesis of 1912 and points to a rare event in the history of science. A theory is developed to explain one phenomenon ± the double refraction of light. It leads to the question: what would happen if the wavelength of light in the theory is comparable to the spacing of the oscillators? The answer, that the theory made no approximation and was valid for almost any ratio of wavelength to spacing, opened the path towards the discovery of the diffraction of X-rays which, at that time, was one of the most important tools needed to unlock the mystery of the structure of the atom and, subsequently, of all matter that makes up our everyday world. It is paradoxical that Ewald's theory, which led to the discovery of X-ray diffraction, was hardly needed in the following half century of research to study the physical structure of the crystalline and amorphous materials that ®ll our earthly world. Instead, the simpler kinematic theory of X-ray diffraction suf®ced for most efforts of crystallographers to determine the structure and location of atoms in almost any con®guration of scienti®c and technological interest until the decades of the 1950's and 1960's. Although it had been around for some 30 years, in the early part of the 1950's dynamical diffraction was an esoteric ®eld which one learned about in an advanced course in X-ray diffraction. The theory was used to explain Bragg scattering from natural crystals that were highly perfect. Diamond and calcite are prime examples of such crystals where observed Bragg diffraction curves did not even come close to matching those of most materials whose crystal structure still could be determined using the simple theory for weakly scattering crystals. However, two developments changed the situation and propelled dynamical diffraction into prominence. First, the transistor was invented and semiconductors grew from minute oddities in the world of crystals to such an important entity that an entire valley in California was named after one of them! Crystals, ®rst of germanium, then of silicon, were grown to become the raw materials of the semiconductor revolution and these, by any measure, were orders of magnitude more perfect than anything nature could produce. X-rays diffracted from them in a manner that could only be understood through the subtleties and complexities of dynamical diffraction, this theory that had interested only a small group of X-ray scientists in the backwaters of crystallographic research in the 20th century. To understand semiconductor properties, it was necessary to understand the structural details of Ge and Si which demonstrably affected their electrical properties. Understanding every aspect of these crystals was a driving force in solid-state physics and was lavishly funded by the semiconductor industry. These crystals became the platform from which one could launch studies in a wide range of problems in solid-state physics and materials science. For example, studying defects in Ge and Si was easier than in metals because collateral work on puri®cation and crystal growth provided specimens of known progeny, and studying dislocations is much easier in crystals where the defect densities are of the order of 10 cmÿ2 rather than in metals where the density could be many orders of magnitude higher. To study elastic properties and motion of defects in chemically and structurally nearly perfect crystals, X-ray and electron diffraction became the primary tools. For both these techniques, dynamical diffraction was the dominant scattering mode. The second development was the rise of synchrotron radiation, which turned what had been a waste product of accelerators for high-energy physics into a booming new scienti®c enterprise. These X-rays had spectacular intensity and brightness and opened new vistas for X-ray research in a manner similar to that in which lasers affected research in physical optics. When the potential for research with this Xradiation was appreciated, machines were developed just to produce synchrotron radiation. The way in which perfect crystals diffracted X-rays was a natural match to the brightness of these new synchrotron beams, and dynamical diffraction from perfect crystals changed from a curiosity of the diffraction of X-rays to the primary means of directing synchrotron radiation to an experimental sample. Professor Authier has devoted his entire professional career to developing and applying dynamical diffraction theory. In this remarkable book, which is both an indepth review and a tutorial, he catalogs a half-century of the use of X-rays to study perfect crystals. The book traces the historical development of the ®eld of dynamical diffraction as it has evolved from Ewald's thesis in 1912. Professor Authier divides the work loosely into four parts. The four chapters of Part I give the beginner with a rudimentary knowledge of kinematic diffraction the opportunity to gain facility with the dynamical theory and to acquire a basic understanding of why perfect crystals diffract X-rays in exotic ways. Chapters 1 and 2 give the reader a good physical understanding of dynamical diffraction by presenting the mathematical treatment needed to obtain a working knowledge of how to apply it to real problems and Chapter 4 is an outstanding treatment of many interesting and useful applications of the theory including PendelloÈsung, asymmetric diffraction (an important parameter in highresolution diffraction and spectroscopy) and the subtleties of the Darwin curves produced when diffracting from the faces of perfect crystals. Chapter 3, present for completeness, is a ten page description of general (ordinary) diffraction theory, but a reader unfamiliar with this would do better to consult one of the standard texts in the ®eld. book reviews