English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The consequences of light adaptation and acclimation of photosynthesis on photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), particularly as it relates to the efficiency of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) use in photosynthetic CO(2) assimilation, was studied in the sun species Glycine max and the shade species Alocasia macrorrhiza. Both G. max and A. macrorrhiza were found to possess the capacity for light acclimation of CO(2) assimilation, but over distinctly different ranges of photon flux density (PFD). For each species, light acclimation of photosynthesis had little effect on the rate of photosynthesis per unit Rubisco protein or the light response of Rubisco carbamylation and CA 1P metabolism. In contrast, photosynthesis per unit Rubisco protein was significantly higher in G. max than in A. macrorrhiza, due in part to a lower total (fully carbamylated) molar activity (activity per unit enzyme) of A. macrorrhiza Rubisco than that of G. max. Comparison of the light response of Rubisco regulatory mechanisms between G. max and A. macrorrhiza indicated some degree of adaptation, such that carbamylation was higher and CA 1P levels lower at lower PFDs in the shade species than the sun species. However, this adjustment was not sufficient for Rubisco in low light grown A. macrorrhiza to be fully active at the growth PFD. Photosynthesis in A. macrorrhiza appeared to become RuBP regeneration-limited at lower PFDs than G. max, and this was probably the determinant of the light saturated rate of photosynthesis in the shade species. The low efficiency of Rubisco use in A. macrorrhiza was a major contributing factor to its five- to sixfold lower photosynthetic NUE than G. max. Shade species such as A. macrorrhiza appear to make far from maximal use of Rubisco protein N.

Light Adaptation/Acclimation of Photosynthesis and the Regulation of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity in Sun and Shade Plants