English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The growth and net photosynthetic properties of seedlings of Pinus silvestris L. and Betula verrucosa Ehrh., grown under identical conditions in a controlled environment chamber, were compared. The relative growth rate of birch was about twice that of pine. The rates of in situ net photosynthesis were 1.50 and 2.30 micromoles CO(2) meter(-2) second(-1) and the photosynthetic quantum yields under light-limiting conditions were 0.022 and 0.032 for pine and birch, respectively. The total leaf surface areas were used for calculating the CO(2) flux densities. The difference in the rates of in situ net photosynthesis depended equally on morphological and metabolic factors. It was assumed that a pronounced mutual shading and an unfavorable leaf inclination made the pine seedlings less efficient in absorbing the unidirectional light of the climate chamber than the broadleaved seedlings of birch. Both pine and birch were adapted to the growth conditions so the flux densities of absorbed quanta were rate-limiting for in situ net photosynthesis. It was concluded that the difference in the photosynthetic quantum yields (i.e. the linear slope of the photosynthetic light curve) of the two species defined the metabolically controlled part of the difference in the rate of in situ net photosynthesis. The quantum yield of pine was lower than that of birch and was partly explained by pine having a higher rate of photorespiration than birch. The remaining difference was most likely controlled by the properties of the chloroplast thylakoids, e.g. energy transfer efficiency between pigments, photosynthetic electron transport, or coupling between electron transport and photophosphorylation.

On the Reason for the Different Photosynthetic Rates of Seedlings of Pinus silvestris and Betula verrucosa