English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The phenomenon of the etiolated hook is not restricted to the hypocotyl of the dicotyledenous plant (e.g., Phaseolus) but appears to serve a similar, adaptive function in the petioles of certain rhizomatous plants. The commonly employed regulants of hypocotyl hook opening were tested for their effect on the petiolar hook of Dentaria diphylla. The hook was found to require both light (red light promoted, far red inhibited) and the intact leaf for opening. The leaf requirement was fully replaced by gibberellic acid (0.04% in lanolin) but only in light; cobalt chloride (0.1-1.0 mm) promoted a partial opening in dark with or without leaf; and coumarin (1 mm), indoleacetic acid (1-4% in lanolin), and ethylene 10 microliter per liter all inhibited opening of hooks with or without lamina. The absolute requirement for light and leaf tissue and the replacement of proximal tissue by GA(3) alone represent marked differences in the physiology of hypocotyl and petiolar hooks. These differences are believed to indicate the necessity for concomitant leaf maturation in petiolar hook opening.

The Role of Light and Growth Regulators in the Opening of the Dentaria Petiolar Hook