z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
IMMUTANS Does Not Act as a Stress-Induced Safety Valve in the Protection of the Photosynthetic Apparatus of Arabidopsis during Steady-State Photosynthesis
Author(s) -
Dominic Rosso,
Alexander G. Ivanov,
Aigen Fu,
Jane Geisler-Lee,
Luke Hendrickson,
Matt Geisler,
Gregory Stewart,
Marianna Król,
Vaughan Hurry,
Steven R. Rodermel,
Denis P. Maxwell,
Norman P. A. Huner
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
plant physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.554
H-Index - 312
eISSN - 1532-2548
pISSN - 0032-0889
DOI - 10.1104/pp.106.085886
Subject(s) - photosystem ii , thylakoid , plastoquinone , photosynthesis , photoinhibition , electron transport chain , photosystem i , chlorophyll fluorescence , biology , arabidopsis , biophysics , arabidopsis thaliana , photoprotection , alternative oxidase , biochemistry , photochemistry , chemistry , chloroplast , mutant , mitochondrion , gene
IMMUTANS (IM) encodes a thylakoid membrane protein that has been hypothesized to act as a terminal oxidase that couples the reduction of O(2) to the oxidation of the plastoquinone (PQ) pool of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Because IM shares sequence similarity to the stress-induced mitochondrial alternative oxidase (AOX), it has been suggested that the protein encoded by IM acts as a safety valve during the generation of excess photosynthetically generated electrons. We combined in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analyses with measurements of the redox state of P(700) to assess the capacity of IM to compete with photosystem I for intersystem electrons during steady-state photosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Comparisons were made between wild-type plants, im mutant plants, as well as transgenics in which IM protein levels had been overexpressed six (OE-6 x) and 16 (OE-16 x) times. Immunoblots indicated that IM abundance was the only major variant that we could detect between these genotypes. Overexpression of IM did not result in increased capacity to keep the PQ pool oxidized compared to either the wild type or im grown under control conditions (25 degrees C and photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1)). Similar results were observed either after 3-d cold stress at 5 degrees C or after full-leaf expansion at 5 degrees C and photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1). Furthermore, IM abundance did not enhance protection of either photosystem II or photosystem I from photoinhibition at either 25 degrees C or 5 degrees C. Our in vivo data indicate that modulation of IM expression and polypeptide accumulation does not alter the flux of intersystem electrons to P(700)(+) during steady-state photosynthesis and does not provide any significant photoprotection. In contrast to AOX1a, meta-analyses of published Arabidopsis microarray data indicated that IM expression exhibited minimal modulation in response to myriad abiotic stresses, which is consistent with our functional data. However, IM exhibited significant modulation in response to development in concert with changes in AOX1a expression. Thus, neither our functional analyses of the IM knockout and overexpression lines nor meta-analyses of gene expression support the model that IM acts as a safety valve to regulate the redox state of the PQ pool during stress and acclimation. Rather, IM appears to be strongly regulated by developmental stage of Arabidopsis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom