English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The question as to what triggers stomatal closure during leaf desiccation remains controversial. This paper examines characteristics of the vascular and photosynthetic functions of the leaf to determine which responds most similarly to stomata during desiccation. Leaf hydraulic conductance (K(leaf)) was measured from the relaxation kinetics of leaf water potential (Psi(l)), and a novel application of this technique allowed the response of K(leaf) to Psi(l) to be determined. These "vulnerability curves" show that K(leaf) is highly sensitive to Psi(l) and that the response of stomatal conductance to Psi(l) is closely correlated with the response of K(leaf) to Psi(l). The turgor loss point of leaves was also correlated with K(leaf) and stomatal closure, whereas the decline in PSII quantum yield during leaf drying occurred at a lower Psi(l) than stomatal closure. These results indicate that stomatal closure is primarily coordinated with K(leaf). However, the close proximity of Psi(l) at initial stomatal closure and initial loss of K(leaf) suggest that partial loss of K(leaf) might occur regularly, presumably necessitating repair of embolisms.

Stomatal Closure during Leaf Dehydration, Correlation with Other Leaf Physiological Traits