Prydeet al.Reply:
Author(s) -
Geoff J. Pryde,
Jeremy L. O’Brien,
A. G. White,
Stephen D. Bartlett,
Timothy C. Ralph
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
physical review letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.688
H-Index - 673
eISSN - 1079-7114
pISSN - 0031-9007
DOI - 10.1103/physrevlett.95.048902
Subject(s) - physics , philosophy , theoretical physics
In our Letter we proposed a scheme for nondeterministic quantum nondemolition(QND) measurement of the polarization of a single photon--a photonicqubit--using linear optics and photodetection. The scheme works with nonunitprobability, but success is heralded by the detection of a single photon in themeter output. We provided an experimental demonstration of this scheme andintroduced three universally applicable fidelity measures--the measurementfidelity F_M, the quantum state preparation fidelity F_QSP, and the QNDfidelity F_QND--to quantify its performance. The claim of Kok and Munro intheir Comment [quant-ph/0406120] is that one of our fidelity measures F_M isnot appropriate because it relies on coincidence measurements. We show why thisclaim is wrong from both a fundamental and an operational perspective.Comment: 1 page, no figure
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom