z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prydeet al.Reply:
Author(s) -
Geoff J. Pryde,
Jeremy L. O’Brien,
A. G. White,
Stephen D. Bartlett,
Timothy C. Ralph
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
physical review letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.688
H-Index - 673
eISSN - 1079-7114
pISSN - 0031-9007
DOI - 10.1103/physrevlett.95.048902
Subject(s) - physics , philosophy , theoretical physics
In our Letter we proposed a scheme for nondeterministic quantum nondemolition(QND) measurement of the polarization of a single photon--a photonicqubit--using linear optics and photodetection. The scheme works with nonunitprobability, but success is heralded by the detection of a single photon in themeter output. We provided an experimental demonstration of this scheme andintroduced three universally applicable fidelity measures--the measurementfidelity F_M, the quantum state preparation fidelity F_QSP, and the QNDfidelity F_QND--to quantify its performance. The claim of Kok and Munro intheir Comment [quant-ph/0406120] is that one of our fidelity measures F_M isnot appropriate because it relies on coincidence measurements. We show why thisclaim is wrong from both a fundamental and an operational perspective.Comment: 1 page, no figure

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom