z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Experimental Strategies for the Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins
Author(s) -
Michael Carey,
Craig L. Peterson,
Stephen T. Smale
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
cold spring harbor protocols
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.674
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1940-3402
pISSN - 1559-6095
DOI - 10.1101/pdb.top067470
Subject(s) - dna footprinting , computational biology , footprinting , electrophoretic mobility shift assay , regulator , dna , dna binding protein , consensus sequence , dna sequencing , context (archaeology) , biology , gene , genetics , transcription factor , chemistry , base sequence , paleontology
This article describes approaches for identifying proteins that bind conserved or functional DNA motifs. It discusses the use of consensus sequence databases to identify candidate proteins capable of binding a DNA motif of interest and then explains the potential uses of sophisticated mass spectrometry technology. DNA-binding proteins are most commonly identified by electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA) or DNase I footprinting. Each of these methods is described, and their advantages and limitations are outlined. It is important to stress that each of the strategies discussed in this article may identify one or more proteins that bind a DNA element of interest. However, none of the strategies will necessarily lead to the protein that is the functionally relevant regulator of the control element in the context of the endogenous locus. Regardless of how a DNA-binding protein is isolated and identified, it merely becomes a candidate regulator of the gene of interest.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom