z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Overexpectation: Response Loss During Sustained Stimulus Compounding in the Rabbit Nictitating Membrane Preparation
Author(s) -
E. James Kehoe,
Natasha E. white
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
learning and memory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.228
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1549-5485
pISSN - 1072-0502
DOI - 10.1101/lm.77604
Subject(s) - nictitating membrane , psychology , unconditioned stimulus , stimulus (psychology) , excitatory postsynaptic potential , neuroscience , audiology , hippocampal formation , classical conditioning , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , chemistry , cognitive psychology , conditioning , medicine , mathematics , statistics
Rabbits were given reinforced training of the nictitating membrane (NM) response using separate conditioned stimuli (CSs), which were a tone, light, and/or tactile vibration. Then, two CSs were compounded and given further pairings with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Evidence of both overexpectation and summation effects appeared. That is, responding to the individual CSs declined despite their continued pairing with the US on compound trials (overexpectation), and responding on the compound trials was greater than responding to the individual CSs (summation). The response loss appeared regardless of the testing regime, that is, whether the test presentations of the individual CSs were themselves reinforced (Experiment 2), not reinforced (Experiment 1), or deferred until the end of compound training (Experiment 2). The results are discussed with respect to the roles of excitatory versus inhibitory processes, elemental versus configural processes, and the possible roles of cerebellar and hippocampal pathways.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom