Olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees: Memory dependence on trial number, interstimulus interval, intertrial interval, and protein synthesis
Author(s) -
Martín Giurfa,
Eve Fabre,
Justin FlavenPouchon,
Helga Groll,
Barbara Oberwallner,
Vanina Vergoz,
Edith Roussel,
JeanChristophe Sandoz
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
learning and memory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.228
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1549-5485
pISSN - 1072-0502
DOI - 10.1101/lm.1603009
Subject(s) - interstimulus interval , conditioning , psychology , classical conditioning , stimulus (psychology) , neuroscience , conditioned reflex , measures of conditioned emotional response , audiology , unconditioned stimulus , reflex , cognitive psychology , mathematics , medicine , statistics , stimulation
Harnessed bees learn to associate an odorant with an electric shock so that afterward the odorant alone elicits the sting extension response (SER). We studied the dependency of retention on interstimulus interval (ISI), intertrial interval (ITI), and number of conditioning trials in the framework of olfactory SER conditioning. Forward ISIs (conditioned stimulus [CS] before unconditioned stimulus [US]) supported higher retention than a backward one (US before CS) with an optimum around 3 sec. Spaced trials (ITI 10 min) supported higher retention than massed trials (ITI 1 min) and led to the formation of a late long-term memory (l-LTM) that depended on protein synthesis. Our results reaffirm olfactory SER conditioning as a reliable tool for the study of learning and memory.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom