z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Characterization of complex chromosomal rearrangements by targeted capture and next-generation sequencing
Author(s) -
Nara L. M. Sobreira,
Veena Gnanakkan,
Michael F. Walsh,
Beth Marosy,
Elizabeth Wohler,
George Thomas,
Julie HooverFong,
Ada Hamosh,
Sarah J. Wheelan,
David ValleGarcía
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
genome research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 9.556
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1549-5469
pISSN - 1088-9051
DOI - 10.1101/gr.122986.111
Subject(s) - breakpoint , biology , chromosomal translocation , comparative genomic hybridization , genetics , fluorescence in situ hybridization , chromosomal rearrangement , bacterial artificial chromosome , chromosome , chromosome engineering , karyotype , computational biology , genome , gene
Translocations are a common class of chromosomal aberrations and can cause disease by physically disrupting genes or altering their regulatory environment. Some translocations, apparently balanced at the microscopic level, include deletions, duplications, insertions, or inversions at the molecular level. Traditionally, chromosomal rearrangements have been investigated with a conventional banded karyotype followed by arduous positional cloning projects. More recently, molecular cytogenetic approaches using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), or whole-genome SNP genotyping together with molecular methods such as inverse PCR and quantitative PCR have allowed more precise evaluation of the breakpoints. These methods suffer, however, from being experimentally intensive and time-consuming and of less than single base pair resolution. Here we describe targeted breakpoint capture followed by next-generation sequencing (TBCS) as a new approach to the general problem of determining the precise structural characterization of translocation breakpoints and related chromosomal aberrations. We tested this approach in three patients with complex chromosomal translocations: The first had craniofacial abnormalities and an apparently balanced t(2;3)(p15;q12) translocation; the second has cleidocranial dysplasia (OMIM 119600) associated with a t(2;6)(q22;p12.3) translocation and a breakpoint in RUNX2 on chromosome 6p; and the third has acampomelic campomelic dysplasia (OMIM 114290) associated with a t(5;17)(q23.2;q24) translocation, with a breakpoint upstream of SOX9 on chromosome 17q. Preliminary studies indicated complex rearrangements in patients 1 and 3 with a total of 10 predicted breakpoints in the three patients. By using TBCS, we quickly and precisely defined eight of the 10 breakpoints.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom