z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Continuous decisions
Author(s) -
Seng Bum Michael Yoo,
Benjamin Y. Hayden,
John Pearson
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
philosophical transactions of the royal society b biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.753
H-Index - 272
eISSN - 1471-2970
pISSN - 0962-8436
DOI - 10.1098/rstb.2019.0664
Subject(s) - futures contract , valuation (finance) , computer science , reciprocal , management science , outcome (game theory) , control (management) , foundation (evidence) , action (physics) , risk analysis (engineering) , operations research , microeconomics , economics , artificial intelligence , business , mathematics , political science , linguistics , philosophy , physics , finance , quantum mechanics , financial economics , law
Humans and other animals evolved to make decisions that extend over time with continuous and ever-changing options. Nonetheless, the academic study of decision-making is mostly limited to the simple case of choice between two options. Here, we advocate that the study of choice should expand to includecontinuous decisions . Continuous decisions, by our definition, involve a continuum of possible responses and take place over an extended period of time during which the response is continuously subject to modification. In most continuous decisions, the range of options can fluctuate and is affected by recent responses, making consideration of reciprocal feedback between choices and the environment essential. The study of continuous decisions raises new questions, such as how abstract processes of valuation and comparison are co-implemented with action planning and execution, how we simulate the large number of possible futures our choices lead to, and how our brains employ hierarchical structure to make choices more efficiently. While microeconomic theory has proven invaluable for discrete decisions, we propose that engineering control theory may serve as a better foundation for continuous ones. And while the concept of value has proven foundational for discrete decisions, goal states and policies may prove more useful for continuous ones.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates’.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom