z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Complicated grief: recent developments in diagnostic criteria and treatment
Author(s) -
Satomi Nakajima
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
philosophical transactions of the royal society b biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.753
H-Index - 272
eISSN - 1471-2970
pISSN - 0962-8436
DOI - 10.1098/rstb.2017.0273
Subject(s) - complicated grief , grief , traumatic grief , psychology , mental health , psychiatry , terminology , psychotherapist , intervention (counseling) , medicine , dsm 5 , clinical psychology , linguistics , philosophy
Although grief is a natural response to loss among human beings, some people have a severe and prolonged course of grief. In the 1990s, unusual grief persisting with a high level of acute symptoms became known as ‘complicated grief (CG)’. Many studies have shown that people who suffer from CG are at risk of long-term mental and physical health impairments and suicidal behaviours; it is considered a pathological state, which requires clinical intervention and treatment. DSM-5 (2013Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders , 5th edn) proposed ‘persistent complex bereavement disorder’ as a psychiatric disorder; it is similar to CG in that it is a trauma- and stress-related disorder. In recent years, there has been considerable research on the treatment of CG. Randomized controlled trials have suggested the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy including an exposure component that is targeted for CG. However, experts disagree about the terminology and diagnostic criteria for CG. The ICD-11 (International classification of diseases , 11th revision) beta draft proposed prolonged grief disorder as a condition that differs from persistent complex bereavement disorder with respect to terminology and the duration of symptoms. This divergence has arisen from insufficient evidence for a set of core symptoms and the biological basis of CG. Future studies including biological studies are needed to reach consensus about the diagnostic criteria for CG.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary thanatology: impacts of the dead on the living in humans and other animals’.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom