Individual differences in children's innovative problem-solving are not predicted by divergent thinking or executive functions
Author(s) -
Sarah R. Beck,
Clare Williams,
Nicola Cutting,
Ian A. Apperly,
Jackie Chappell
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
philosophical transactions of the royal society b biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.753
H-Index - 272
eISSN - 1471-2970
pISSN - 0962-8436
DOI - 10.1098/rstb.2015.0190
Subject(s) - working memory , executive functions , psychology , divergent thinking , cognitive psychology , proxy (statistics) , creativity , developmental psychology , cognitive flexibility , variation (astronomy) , cognition , flexibility (engineering) , social psychology , computer science , neuroscience , statistics , physics , mathematics , machine learning , astrophysics
Recent studies of children's tool innovation have revealed that there is variation in children's success in middle-childhood. In two individual differences studies, we sought to identify personal characteristics that might predict success on an innovation task. In Study 1, we found that although measures of divergent thinking were related to each other they did not predict innovation success. In Study 2, we measured executive functioning including: inhibition, working memory, attentional flexibility and ill-structured problem-solving. None of these measures predicted innovation, but, innovation was predicted by children's performance on a receptive vocabulary scale that may function as a proxy for general intelligence. We did not find evidence that children's innovation was predicted by specific personal characteristics.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom