z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
Author(s) -
Bruno Neininger,
Bryce F. J. Kelly,
Jörg Hacker,
Xinyi Lu,
Stefan Schwietzke
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
philosophical transactions of the royal society a mathematical physical and engineering sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1471-2962
pISSN - 1364-503X
DOI - 10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
Subject(s) - environmental science , methane , greenhouse gas , methane emissions , natural gas , fugitive emissions , coal , global warming potential , coal mining , environmental engineering , waste management , engineering , geology , chemistry , oceanography , organic chemistry
Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH4 ) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH4 emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH4 emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH4 emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom