A systems framework for national assessment of climate risks to infrastructure
Author(s) -
Richard Dawson,
David B. Thompson,
D. Michael Johns,
Frances Wood,
Geoff Darch,
Lee Chapman,
P. N. Hughes,
Geoff Watson,
Kevin Paulson,
Sarah Bell,
Simon N. Gosling,
William Powrie,
Jim W. Hall
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
philosophical transactions of the royal society a mathematical physical and engineering sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.074
H-Index - 169
eISSN - 1471-2962
pISSN - 1364-503X
DOI - 10.1098/rsta.2017.0298
Subject(s) - critical infrastructure , climate change , adaptation (eye) , business , flood myth , environmental planning , flooding (psychology) , investment (military) , environmental resource management , natural hazard , risk assessment , risk analysis (engineering) , environmental science , computer science , geography , political science , computer security , optics , psychotherapist , biology , psychology , ecology , physics , archaeology , politics , meteorology , law
Extreme weather causes substantial adverse socio-economic impacts by damaging and disrupting the infrastructure services that underpin modern society. Globally, $2.5tn a year is spent on infrastructure which is typically designed to last decades, over which period projected changes in the climate will modify infrastructure performance. A systems approach has been developed to assess risks across all infrastructure sectors to guide national policy making and adaptation investment. The method analyses diverse evidence of climate risks and adaptation actions, to assess the urgency and extent of adaptation required. Application to the UK shows that despite recent adaptation efforts, risks to infrastructure outweigh opportunities. Flooding is the greatest risk to all infrastructure sectors: even if the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 2°C is achieved, the number of users reliant on electricity infrastructure at risk of flooding would double, while a 4°C rise could triple UK flood damage. Other risks are significant, for example 5% and 20% of river catchments would be unable to meet water demand with 2°C and 4°C global warming respectively. Increased interdependence between infrastructure systems, especially from energy and information and communication technology (ICT), are amplifying risks, but adaptation action is limited by lack of clear responsibilities. A programme to build national capability is urgently required to improve infrastructure risk assessment.This article is part of the theme issue 'Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy'.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom