z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Maya calendar inscription, interpreted by Goodman's tables
Author(s) -
Alfred Percival Maudslay
Publication year - 1898
Publication title -
proceedings of the royal society of london
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2053-9126
pISSN - 0370-1662
DOI - 10.1098/rspl.1897.0081
Subject(s) - maya , interpretation (philosophy) , history , ancient history , art , classics , archaeology , philosophy , linguistics
Our knowledge of the Maya Calendar is chiefly derived from the writings (a.d. 1566) of Diego de Lauda, Bishop of Yucatan, who not only gave some account of the divisions of tim e in use among the Mayas, but also copied, somewhat roughly, in his m anuscript the signs employed to represent th e eighteen named months, and the twenty named days into which each month was divided. Our knowledge of the Maya Calendar is chiefly derived from the writings (a. d. 1566) of Diego de Lauda, Bishop of Yucatan, who not only gave some account of the divisions of time in use among the Mayas, but also copied, somewhat roughly, in his manuscript the signs employed to represent the eighteen named months, and the twenty named days into which each month was divided. Landa’s statem ents are, however, by no means clear, and there has been much discussion both as to their correctness in them selves and as to the interpretation which has been given to them; moreover, it has been found difficult in some instances to identify the day and month signs given by him with those used in the Dresden Codex and the few Maya manuscripts which have been preserved, and still more difficult to identify them with the signs used in the carved inscriptions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom