Experimental researches on atomic weights

This paper is a continuation of the Essay, by the same author, on the Composition of the Chloride of Barium, which was published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1829. Having shown that the atomic weights current among British chemists, though in some in stances correct, or tolerably approximative, have, as a whole, been adopted on insufficient evidence, he proceeds, in this paper, to give an account of the experiments he has made to ascertain the equivalent numbers for lead, chlorine, silver, barium, and nitrogen. Finding, with reference to lead, that the method adopted by Berzelius did not afford uniform results, he endeavoured to ascertain the quantity of subsulphate of lead which given weights of metallic lead and the protoxide of that metal respectively produce. He details the mode he employed for the conversion of metallic lead into the subsulphate by a mixture of nitric and sulphuric acids, diluted with an equal bulk of water, and the precautions he adopted to avoid loss. The mean of three experiments gave 146·375 grains of sulphate of lead for 100 grains of metallic lead. By the mean of four experiments, Berzelius had obtained, instead of the former number, 146·419. Dr. Turner adopts the mean of the whole, namely, 146·41. By prosecuting this inquiry, he finds the sulphate to consist of 73·575 of protoxide of lead, and 26·425 of sulphuric acid; and that the former contains 5·274 of oxygen. According to these results, the equivalent number for lead is 103·6. By experiments with the chloride of lead, which gave very uniform results, Dr. Turner obtained an equivalent number for chlorine, closely agreeing with that calculated from the analysis of chlorate of potash in the experiments of Berzelius, namely, 35·45, but totally inconsistent with the atomic weight assigned to it by British chemists. The accuracy of this result was further confirmed by a careful comparative analysis of the binoxide and bichloride of mercury.