z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On the inflexion of light
Author(s) -
John Barton
Publication year - 1837
Publication title -
abstracts of the papers printed in the philosophical transactions of the royal society of london
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2053-9142
pISSN - 0365-5695
DOI - 10.1098/rspl.1830.0044
Subject(s) - shadow (psychology) , bent molecular geometry , physics , opacity , halo , geometry , inflection point , optics , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , point (geometry) , brightness , mathematics , astrophysics , computer science , computer vision , psychology , chemistry , organic chemistry , galaxy , psychotherapist
The design of the author in undertaking the experiments of which he gives an account in the present paper, is to carry on the investigation of the phenomena of the inflexion of light from the point at which it was left by Newton. He begins by examining these phenomena in their simplest form, comparing the appearance of the shadow of an opaque body on a screen of white paper at different distances, with the appearance it would exhibit if the rays passed by the edge of the body, without suffering any deviation from a rectilinear course. It is well known that, under these circumstances, the real shadow is broader than the geometrical shadow, indicating a deflexion of the rays from the edge of the intercepting body. By varying the distances at which the observations are taken, it is found that the rays are not bent at a sharp angle, but pursue a curvilinear course, the concavity of which is towards the shadow, the curve itself resembling an hyperbola. A luminous halo also appears beyond the shadow; the breadth of this halo agreeing accurately, at all distances, with the space which the penumbra should occupy, if the rays were not bent. The author thinks it impossible to reconcile the explanation of these phenomena given by Newton, with his own hypothesis concerning the action of solid'bodies on light, as stated in the “Principia:” for, in that hypothesis, the rays passing nearest to the edge of an intercepting body are supposed to be bent towards the edge, as if attracted; whereas the explanation proceeds upon the supposition that they are bent from that body, as if repelled. The actual hyperbolic course of the rays is also inconsistent with that hypothesis, which would assign to them a parabolic path. It also appears that the breadth of the spectrum made by receiving the sun’s rays through an aperture one tenth of an inch, or more, in width, is less than if the rays proceeded in straight lines; but if the aperture is very much diminished, the result is reversed, the real spectrum being broader than the geometrical spectrum.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom