z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sexual selection's impacts on ecological specialization: an experimental test
Author(s) -
Karin S. Pfennig,
David W. Pfennig,
Cody Porter,
Ryan A. Martin
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
proceedings of the royal society b biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1471-2954
pISSN - 0962-8452
DOI - 10.1098/rspb.2015.0217
Subject(s) - sexual selection , ecological selection , biology , ecology , disruptive selection , selection (genetic algorithm) , natural selection , competition (biology) , trait , mate choice , mating , mating preferences , ecological speciation , adaptation (eye) , population , experimental evolution , mating system , demography , gene flow , biochemistry , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , sociology , computer science , gene , programming language , genetic variation
In many species, individuals specialize on different resources, thereby reducing competition. Such ecological specialization can promote the evolution of alternative ecomorphs-distinct phenotypes adapted for particular resources. Elucidating whether and how this process is influenced by sexual selection is crucial for understanding how ecological specialization promotes the evolution of novel traits and, potentially, speciation between ecomorphs. We evaluated the population-level effects of sexual selection (as mediated by mate choice) on ecological specialization in spadefoot toad tadpoles that express alternative ecomorphs. We manipulated whether sexual selection was present or reversed by mating females to their preferred versus non-preferred males, respectively. We then exposed their tadpoles to resource competition in experimental mesocosms. The resulting distribution of ecomorphs was similar between treatments, but sexual selection generated poorer trait integration in, and lower fitness of, the more specialized carnivore morph. Moreover, disruptive and directional natural selection were weaker in the sexual selection present treatment. Nevertheless, this effect on disruptive selection was smaller than previously documented effects of ecological opportunity and competitor density. Thus, sexual selection can inhibit adaptation to resource competition and thereby hinder ecological specialization, particularly when females obtain fitness benefits from mate choice that offset the cost of producing competitively inferior offspring.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom