z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The vegetative morphology of Pistia and the Lemnaceæ
Author(s) -
Agnes Arber
Publication year - 1920
Publication title -
proceedings of the royal society of london. series b, containing papers of a biological character
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2053-9185
pISSN - 0950-1193
DOI - 10.1098/rspb.1920.0002
Subject(s) - frond , scope (computer science) , morphology (biology) , philosophy , botany , value (mathematics) , biology , mathematics , paleontology , computer science , statistics , programming language
The nature of the duckweed “frond” has presented a baffling problem to botanists since the early days of vegetable morphology. A detailed history of the views that have been held on the question need scarcely be attempted here, since the extreme reduction of the Lemnaceæ has offered scope for wild surmises of little scientific value. The principal theories which have been put forward may, however, be summarised as follows :— The “fronds” of the Lemnaceæ have been regarded as :— (1) Entirely axial (Hegelmaier, F. (1868)). (2) Entirely foliar (Goebel, K. (1891-3)). (3) Foliar in the distal region and axial in the proximal region (Horen, F. van (1869), Engler, A. (1877), and Velenovský, J. (1907)). The objections to (1) and (2) are obvious: these views can only be maintained if—in the first case—certain essentially foliar qualities be attributed to stem organs, and—in the second case—if leaves be assumed to possess some of the distinctive properties of stems. It is not inconceivable that such assumptions might find justification, but they should only be used as a last resort, in the case of no adequate explanation on normal lines being forthcoming.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here