Open AccessThe cause of Encke's division in Saturn's ring
Publication year - 1922
Publication title -
proceedings of the royal society of london. series a, containing papers of a mathematical and physical character
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2053-9150
pISSN - 0950-1207
DOI - 10.1098/rspa.1922.0043
Subject(s) - rings of saturn , titan (rocket family) , physics , ecliptic , saturn , astronomy , radius , ring (chemistry) , satellite , astrobiology , astrophysics , planet , chemistry , computer science , computer security , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , magnetic field , solar wind
In a former paper, the effect of satellites in producing divisions in Saturn’s Rings was discussed. The case taken was that where the satellite orbit and the rings were co-planar. The results afforded an explanation of the outer dimension of the Ring, Cassini’s Division, the inner radius of the bright ring, and the existence of the Crêpe Ring. But no reason was given for the existence of Encke’s Division, nor the numerous divisions reported by Lowell. In carrying the examination further, the fact that the satellite orbits are not precisely co-planar with the ring system must be considered. As given by the ‘Annuaire du Bureau des Longitudes,’ the inclination of the plane of the rings to the ecliptic is 28° 5·6', while the corresponding inclinations of the satellite orbits are— Mimas . . . . . . 27° 29·6', Dione . . . . . . 28° 4·4', Encelad us . . . 28° 4·3', Rhea . . . . . . 28° 22·8', Tethys . . . . . . 28° 40·5', Titan . . . . . . . 27° 39·7'. In the cases of Mimas, Tethys, and Titan, the differences are distinctly marked, the first being 36', or 0·01 of a radian. The effect of this inclination is examined in the sequel.