z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Hypothesis awareness confounds asynchronous control conditions in indirect measures of the rubber hand illusion
Author(s) -
Peter Lush,
Anil K. Seth,
Zoltán Dienes
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
royal society open science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 51
ISSN - 2054-5703
DOI - 10.1098/rsos.210911
Subject(s) - multisensory integration , psychology , proprioception , asynchronous communication , illusion , skin conductance , arousal , control (management) , cognitive psychology , sensory system , social psychology , computer science , artificial intelligence , medicine , computer network , neuroscience , biomedical engineering
Reports of changes in experiences of body location and ownership following synchronous tactile and visual stimulation of fake and real hands (rubber hand (RH) effects) are widely attributed to multisensory integration mechanisms. However, existing control methods for subjective report measures (asynchronous stroking and control statements) are confounded by participant hypothesis awareness; the report may reflect response to demand characteristics. Subjective report is often accompanied by indirect (also called ‘objective’ or ‘implicit’) measures. Here, we report tests of expectancies for synchronous ‘illusion’ and asynchronous ‘control’ conditions across two pre-registered studies ( n = 140 and n = 45) for two indirect measures: proprioceptive drift (a change in perceived hand location) and skin conductance response (a measure of physiological arousal). Expectancies for synchronous condition measures were greater than for asynchronous conditions in both studies. Differences between synchronous and asynchronous control condition measures are therefore confounded by hypothesis awareness. This means indirect measures of RH effects may reflect compliance, bias and phenomenological control in response to demand characteristics, just as for subjective measures. Valid control measures are required to support claims of a role of multisensory integration for both direct and indirect measures of RH effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here