z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An unethical optimization principle
Author(s) -
Nicholas Beale,
Heather Battey,
A. C. Davison,
Robert S. MacKay
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
royal society open science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 51
ISSN - 2054-5703
DOI - 10.1098/rsos.200462
Subject(s) - algorithm , computer science , machine learning , function (biology) , artificial intelligence , space (punctuation) , odds , mathematics , statistics , logistic regression , evolutionary biology , biology , operating system
If an artificial intelligence aims to maximize risk-adjusted return, then under mild conditions it is disproportionately likely to pick an unethical strategy unless the objective function allows sufficiently for this risk. Even if the proportion η of available unethical strategies is small, the probability p U of picking an unethical strategy can become large; indeed, unless returns are fat-tailed p U tends to unity as the strategy space becomes large. We define an unethical odds ratio,Υ(capital upsilon), that allows us to calculate p U from η , and we derive a simple formula for the limit ofΥas the strategy space becomes large. We discuss the estimation ofΥand p U in finite cases and how to deal with infinite strategy spaces. We show how the principle can be used to help detect unethical strategies and to estimate η . Finally we sketch some policy implications of this work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom