Censoring Huxley and Wilberforce: A new source for the meeting that the Athenaeum ‘wisely softened down’
Author(s) -
Richard England
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
notes and records the royal society journal of the history of science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.19
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1743-0178
pISSN - 0035-9149
DOI - 10.1098/rsnr.2016.0058
Subject(s) - charles darwin , narrative , history , classics , censoring (clinical trials) , philosophy , literature , medicine , epistemology , art , pathology , darwinism
In mid July 1860, the Athenaeum published a summary of the discussions about Charles Darwin's theory that took place at the British Association meeting in Oxford. Its account omitted the famous exchange between Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford, and Thomas Huxley, the rising man of science. A fuller report of the meeting was published a week later in a local weekly, the Oxford Chronicle , but this has gone unnoticed by historians. The Oxford Chronicle supplies a new version of Wilberforce's question to Huxley, with more material about religious objections to human evolution and the proper role of authority in popular scientific discussions. Excerpts from the Athenaeum and Oxford Chronicle accounts show that they likely had a common ancestor, and other sources corroborate details given only in the Oxford Chronicle . This discovery reveals that the Athenaeum narrative-until now the longest and best known-was censored to remove material that was considered objectionable. The Oxford Chronicle gives us a fuller story of what was said and how the audience reacted to the encounter between Huxley and Wilberforce.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom