z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure
Author(s) -
Ritwik K. Niyogi,
Yannick-André Breton,
Rebecca B. Solomon,
Kent Conover,
Peter Shizgal,
Peter Dayan
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of the royal society interface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.655
H-Index - 139
eISSN - 1742-5689
pISSN - 1742-5662
DOI - 10.1098/rsif.2013.0969
Subject(s) - normative , lever , work (physics) , normative model of decision making , function (biology) , leisure time , control (management) , economics , psychology , econometrics , microeconomics , social psychology , cognitive psychology , mathematical economics , computer science , artificial intelligence , epistemology , medicine , physics , physical medicine and rehabilitation , biology , physical activity , thermodynamics , philosophy , quantum mechanics , evolutionary biology
Dividing limited time between work and leisure when both have their attractions is a common everyday decision. We provide a normative control-theoretic treatment of this decision that bridges economic and psychological accounts. We show how our framework applies to free-operant behavioural experiments in which subjects are required to work (depressing a lever) for sufficient total time (called the price) to receive a reward. When the microscopic benefit-of-leisure increases nonlinearly with duration, the model generates behaviour that qualitatively matches various microfeatures of subjects' choices, including the distribution of leisure bout durations as a function of the pay-off. We relate our model to traditional accounts by deriving macroscopic, molar, quantities from microscopic choices.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom