z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Faces and fitness: attractive evolutionary relationship or ugly hypothesis?
Author(s) -
James M. Smoliga,
Gerald S. Zavorsky
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
biology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.596
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1744-957X
pISSN - 1744-9561
DOI - 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0839
Subject(s) - generalizability theory , attractiveness , realm , facial attractiveness , biology , physical attractiveness , range (aeronautics) , cognitive psychology , social psychology , psychology , developmental psychology , materials science , political science , psychoanalysis , law , composite material
In recent years, various studies have attempted to understand human evolution by examining relationships between athletic performance or physical fitness and facial attractiveness. Over a wide range of five homogeneous groups (n = 327), there is an approximate 3% shared variance between facial attractiveness and athletic performance or physical fitness (95% CI = 0.5-8%, p = 0.002). Further, studies relating human performance and attractiveness often have major methodological limitations that limit their generalizability. Thus, despite statistical significance, the association between facial attractiveness and human performance has questionable biological importance. Here, we present a critique of these studies and provide recommendations to improve the quality of future research in this realm.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom