z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Regional differences in predictive accuracy of WHO immunologic failure criteria
Author(s) -
Agnes Kiragga,
Barbara Castelnuovo,
Moses R. Kamya,
Richard Moore,
Yukari C. Manabe
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
aids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.195
H-Index - 216
eISSN - 1473-5571
pISSN - 0269-9370
DOI - 10.1097/qad.0b013e32835143e3
Subject(s) - medicine , predictive value , regimen , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , population , antiretroviral treatment , sida , immunology , antiretroviral therapy , viral disease , viral load , environmental health
We compared the performance of the WHO immunologic criteria for treatment failure among Uganda and American patients. Antiretroviral treatment-naive patients with a CD4 T-cell count less than 200 cells/μl or AIDS at enrollment on a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based regimen for more than 1 year were selected. For all criteria, the positive predictive value was significantly higher in the American compared with the Ugandan patients. Population-specific guidelines should be developed using large African cohorts to identify more specific and sensitive criteria.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here