z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Empirical evaluation of the need for ‘on-going consent’ in clinical research
Author(s) -
William Smith,
Christine Grady,
Benjamin Krohmal,
Jaime Lazovski,
David Wendler
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
aids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.195
H-Index - 216
eISSN - 1473-5571
pISSN - 0269-9370
DOI - 10.1097/qad.0b013e328340fec7
Subject(s) - informed consent , clinical research , medicine , empirical research , intensive care medicine , family medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , philosophy , epistemology
Some commentators argue that informed consent for clinical research should be an on-going process, which begins, rather than ends, with participants' initial consent. Lacking, however, are empirical data on whether there is a need for 'on-going consent'.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom