z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Endoscopy Following Pediatric Intestinal Transplant
Author(s) -
Yeh Joanna,
Ngo Khiet D.,
Wozniak Laura J.,
Vargas Jorge H.,
Marcus Elizabeth A.,
McDiarmid Sue V.,
Farmer Douglas G.,
Venick Robert S.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.206
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1536-4801
pISSN - 0277-2116
DOI - 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000871
Subject(s) - medicine , esophagogastroduodenoscopy , endoscopy , biopsy , perforation , surgery , retrospective cohort study , complication , radiology , materials science , metallurgy , punching
Objectives: Biopsies remain the criterion standard in the diagnosis of intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection, and gastrointestinal endoscopy plays a pivotal role in patient management. Herein, we describe a single‐center 23‐year endoscopic experience in pediatric ITx recipients. Methods: A retrospective review of endoscopy and pathology reports of all ITx recipients <18 years old transplanted between 1991 and 2013 was performed with the aim of describing the procedural indications, findings, and complications. Results: A total of 1770 endoscopic procedures within 1014 sessions were performed. A combination of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileoscopy was the most common procedure (36%). Increased stool output (35%) and surveillance endoscopy (32%) were the most common indications. A total of 162 episodes of biopsy‐proven rejection were diagnosed. The first episode of rejection occurred at a median of 1 month after ITx. Of histology‐proven rejections, 45% had normal‐appearing endoscopies. The rate of procedural complications, including but not limited to bleeding and perforation, was 1.8%. Conclusions: Endoscopy with biopsy plays a significant role in the care of ITx recipients. Multiple procedures are required for graft surveillance, diagnosis of rejection, subsequent treatment, and follow‐up of therapy. The gross endoscopic appearance, particularly in mild to moderate acute cellular rejection, does not correlate well with histology. Complex anatomy, complication rates that are higher than patients with non‐ITx pediatric endoscopy, and timely histologic interpretation by experienced pathologists are reasons that these procedures should be performed at centers accustomed to caring for ITx recipients. The field would benefit from the development of a noninvasive biomarker to reliably and efficiently detect rejection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here