Open AccessEstimating the Per-Exposure Effect of Infectious Disease Interventions
Author(s) -
Justin O’Hagan,
Marc Lipsitch,
Miguel A. Hernán
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.901
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1531-5487
pISSN - 1044-3983
DOI - 10.1097/ede.0000000000000003
Subject(s) - infectious disease (medical specialty) , psychological intervention , epidemiology , medicine , disease , estimation , population , intervention (counseling) , statistics , econometrics , environmental health , demography , mathematics , economics , pathology , management , psychiatry , sociology
The average effect of an infectious disease intervention (eg, a vaccine) varies across populations with different degrees of exposure to the pathogen. As a result, many investigators favor a per-exposure effect measure that is considered independent of the population level of exposure and that can be used in simulations to estimate the total disease burden averted by an intervention across different populations. However, while per-exposure effects are frequently estimated, the quantity of interest is often poorly defined, and assumptions in its calculation are typically left implicit. In this article, we build upon work by Halloran and Struchiner (Epidemiology. 1995;6:142-151) to develop a formal definition of the per-exposure effect and discuss conditions necessary for its unbiased estimation. With greater care paid to the parameterization of transmission models, their results can be better understood and can thereby be of greater value to decision-makers.