Odour reduction interventions for simple pit latrines in rural Ethiopia: a randomized study
Author(s) -
Solomon Aragie,
Dionna M. Wittberg,
Kristen Aiemjoy,
Jason Melo,
M. J. Smith,
Scott D. Nash,
Zerihun Tadesse,
Jeremy D. Keenan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
transactions of the royal society of tropical medicine and hygiene
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1878-3503
pISSN - 0035-9203
DOI - 10.1093/trstmh/traa039
Subject(s) - latrine , pit latrine , confidence interval , randomized controlled trial , significant difference , environmental health , toxicology , medicine , environmental science , environmental engineering , sanitation , surgery , biology
Pit latrines are promoted in resource-limited settings, but unpleasant odours may deter their use. In this study, latrines in rural Ethiopia were randomized to the addition of cooking ash, the addition of boiling water or neither. Study staff ranked odour on a 6-point scale before and approximately 24 h after intervention. Following intervention, odour grades were on average 0.2 points lower (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 lower to 0.3 higher) in ash-treated latrines and 0.4 points lower (95% CI 0.9 lower to 0.1 higher) in boiled water-treated latrines, although the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). Larger studies might detect a smaller difference.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom