z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Tree responses to drought
Author(s) -
Michael G. Ryan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
tree physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.414
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1758-4469
pISSN - 0829-318X
DOI - 10.1093/treephys/tpr022
Subject(s) - tree (set theory) , biology , mathematics , combinatorics
With global climate change, drought may become more com-mon in the future (IPCC 2007). Several factors will promote more frequent droughts: earlier snowmelt, higher temperatures and higher variability in precipitation. For ecosystems where the water cycle is dominated by snowmelt, warmer tempera-tures bring earlier melt (Stewart et al. 2005) and longer, drier snow-free periods (Westerling et al. 2006). Higher tempera-tures will also increase vapor pressure deficit if evapotranspira-tion does not also increase. Greater variability in precipitation has two implications for plant water balance: longer periods without water, and less captured in the soil in the more intense storms.Many recent tree mortality events have been linked to drought (Allen et al. 2010), but how much do we really know about the drought responses of trees? Physiological responses of trees to low soil water potential vary, but have been fairly well characterized (McDowell et al. 2008)—they vary from concomitantly lower leaf water potential (anisohydric response) to maintenance of leaf water potential above a threshold (isohydric response) with various strategies in between. Many tree species shed leaves during a strong drought, reducing transpiration and photosynthesis, and adjust partitioning to roots and storage (McDowell et al. 2008). Drought also ‘weakens’ trees and makes them more susceptible to insect attacks and pathogens (McDowell et al. 2008). Growth can be reduced through impairment of cell division and cell expansion (Hsiao 197 3), which occurs at a lower water stress threshold than does photosynthetic inhibi-tion (Hsiao et al. 1976). In fact, a variety of physiological processes respond at different plant water potentials (Hsiao 1973, Ditmarova et al. 2010), so that the severity of the drought will influence the physiological response. Drought is also relative—species adapted to low precipitation climates can survive low soil water potentials that would kill or seriously wound trees in more mesic climates and trees in mesic cli-mates might suffer from ‘drought’ that would be normal to trees in xeric climates. Finally, we know that there are many mechanisms of drought tolerance, and that many of these involve coordination within the whole tree.Two papers in this issue try to untangle some of the complex and variable responses of trees to drought. Larcheveque et al. (2011 ) droughted two different hybrid poplar saplings (each with

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom