Incorporating Human Dosimetry and Exposure into High-ThroughputIn VitroToxicity Screening
Author(s) -
Daniel M. Rotroff,
Barbara A. Wetmore,
David J. Dix,
Stephen Ferguson,
Harvey J. Clewell,
Keith A. Houck,
Edward L. LeCluyse,
Melvin E. Andersen,
Richard Judson,
Cornelia M. Smith,
Mark A. Sochaski,
Robert J. Kavlock,
Frank Boellmann,
Matthew T. Martin,
David M. Reif,
John F. Wambaugh,
Russell S. Thomas
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
toxicological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.352
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1096-6080
pISSN - 1096-0929
DOI - 10.1093/toxsci/kfq220
Subject(s) - in vivo , in vitro , prioritization , population , pharmacology , toxicity , high throughput screening , in vitro toxicology , toxicology , chemistry , computational biology , biology , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , bioinformatics , biochemistry , environmental health , management science , economics
Many chemicals in commerce today have undergone limited or no safety testing. To reduce the number of untested chemicals and prioritize limited testing resources, several governmental programs are using high-throughput in vitro screens for assessing chemical effects across multiple cellular pathways. In this study, metabolic clearance and plasma protein binding were experimentally measured for 35 ToxCast phase I chemicals. The experimental data were used to parameterize a population-based in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation model for estimating the human oral equivalent dose necessary to produce a steady-state in vivo concentration equivalent to in vitro AC(50) (concentration at 50% of maximum activity) and LEC (lowest effective concentration) values from the ToxCast data. For 23 of the 35 chemicals, the range of oral equivalent doses for up to 398 ToxCast assays was compared with chronic aggregate human oral exposure estimates in order to assess whether significant in vitro bioactivity occurred within the range of maximum expected human oral exposure. Only 2 of the 35 chemicals, triclosan and pyrithiobac-sodium, had overlapping oral equivalent doses and estimated human oral exposures. Ranking by the potencies of the AC(50) and LEC values, these two chemicals would not have been at the top of a prioritization list. Integrating both dosimetry and human exposure information with the high-throughput toxicity screening efforts provides a better basis for making informed decisions on chemical testing priorities and regulatory attention. Importantly, these tools are necessary to move beyond hazard rankings to estimates of possible in vivo responses based on in vitro screens.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom