z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Economic impact of digital dermatitis, foot rot, and bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle
Author(s) -
Julián A. Cortés,
S. Hendrick,
Eugene D. Janzen,
Ed Pajor,
Karin Orsel
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
translational animal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.477
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2573-2102
DOI - 10.1093/tas/txab076
Subject(s) - feedlot , bovine respiratory disease , zoology , incidence (geometry) , veterinary medicine , beef cattle , cumulative incidence , biology , animal husbandry , animal health , foot rot , medicine , immunology , agriculture , mathematics , cohort , ecology , geometry
Digital dermatitis ( DD ) has emerged in North American feedlots, although production and economic impacts are not fully understood. Objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate the economic impact of a single case of DD, foot rot ( FR ), and bovine respiratory disease ( BRD ) in feedlot cattle and (2) determine its impact on average daily gain ( ADG ). Feedlot cattle health and production records were available from two feedlots for a 3-yr interval. The dataset consisted of 77,115 animal records, with 19.3% (14,900) diagnosed with a disease. Diseased animals were categorized into five groups: DD, FR, BRD, other diseases (OT), and two or more diseases (TM), with a treatment cumulative incidence of 6.0%, 59.1%, 10.7%, 12.7%, and 11.5%, respectively. FR was the disease with the highest cumulative incidence in both heifers and steers (58.8% and 59.6%, respectively). Of all fall-placed cattle diagnosed with any disease, 48.1% of the cases were FR. DD affected the partial budget in five out of the eight groups of cattle, with the highest impact of DD seen in grass yearling heifers and grass yearling steers: $-98 and $-96 CAD, respectively, relative to their healthier counterparts. Healthy cattle had a significantly higher ADG when compared with DD cattle in five of the eight categories, ranging from 0.11 kg/d in winter-placed heifers to 0.17 kg/d in fall-placed steers. In the economic analysis, it was concluded that on an individual animal basis, BRD was the most impactful of all analyzed diseases, whereas DD was second, marking the importance of controlling and mitigating this foot condition. Identifying differential effects of diseases on a partial budget analysis and ADG of the types of cattle stratified by sex enables feedlot producers to focus control and mitigation strategies on specific groups.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom