z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns and Unknown Knowns in DNA Barcoding: A Comment on Dowton et al.
Author(s) -
Rupert A. Collins,
Robert Cruickshank
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
systematic biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.128
H-Index - 182
eISSN - 1076-836X
pISSN - 1063-5157
DOI - 10.1093/sysbio/syu060
Subject(s) - dna barcoding , biology , barcode , coalescent theory , evolutionary biology , locus (genetics) , computational biology , genetics , phylogenetics , computer science , gene , operating system
In a recent commentary, Dowton et al. (2014) propose a framework for “next-generation” DNA barcoding, whereby multi-locus datasets are coupled with coalescent-based species delimitation methods to make specimen identifications. They claim single-locus DNA barcoding is outdated, and a multilocus approach superior, with their assertions supported by an analysis of 33 species of Sarcophaga flesh flies. Here, we reanalyse their data and show that a standard DNA barcode analysis is in fact capable of identifying 99.8% (all but one) of their Sarcophaga specimens, and that their conclusions misrepresent their data. We also discuss the benefits and drawbacks to their vision of “next-gen” barcoding.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom