Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns and Unknown Knowns in DNA Barcoding: A Comment on Dowton et al.
Author(s) -
Rupert A. Collins,
Robert Cruickshank
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
systematic biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.128
H-Index - 182
eISSN - 1076-836X
pISSN - 1063-5157
DOI - 10.1093/sysbio/syu060
Subject(s) - dna barcoding , biology , barcode , coalescent theory , evolutionary biology , locus (genetics) , computational biology , genetics , phylogenetics , computer science , gene , operating system
In a recent commentary, Dowton et al. (2014) propose a framework for “next-generation” DNA barcoding, whereby multi-locus datasets are coupled with coalescent-based species delimitation methods to make specimen identifications. They claim single-locus DNA barcoding is outdated, and a multilocus approach superior, with their assertions supported by an analysis of 33 species of Sarcophaga flesh flies. Here, we reanalyse their data and show that a standard DNA barcode analysis is in fact capable of identifying 99.8% (all but one) of their Sarcophaga specimens, and that their conclusions misrepresent their data. We also discuss the benefits and drawbacks to their vision of “next-gen” barcoding.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom