Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
Author(s) -
Lauriane Jugé,
Fiona L Knapman,
Peter Humburg,
Peter G.R. Burke,
Aimee B Lowth,
Liz Brown,
Jane E. Butler,
Danny J. Eckert,
Joachim Ngiam,
Kate Sutherland,
P Cistulli,
Lynne E. Bilston
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
sleep advances
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-5012
DOI - 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.025
Subject(s) - medicine , tongue , oral appliance , airway , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , sagittal plane , obstructive sleep apnea , surgery , radiology , pathology , botany , biology , genus
Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is currently unreliable. Lower baseline AHI has been associated with better MAS response but is a poor predictor on its own. Imaging markers may enhance prediction. We investigate how the upper airway enlarges via posterior tongue advancement, using tagged MRI during mandibular advancement, as a potential predictor of MAS treatment response. Methods 101 untreated OSA participants (AHI 10–102 events/hr) underwent an MRI scan wearing a MAS. Mid-sagittal tagged MRI images were collected to quantify tongue movement during passive jaw advancement. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of the maximum protrusion. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy. Results 71 participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI<5 or AHI≤10 events/hr with >50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (>50% AHI reduction but AHI>10 events/hr), and 27 non-responders (AHI reduction<50% and AHI≥10 events/hr). Responders had the greatest naso- and oropharyngeal tongue advancement (0.40±0.08 and 0.47±0.13mm, respectively) and oropharynx enlargement (6.41±2.12%) per millimetre of mandibular advancement. The inclusion of these imaging markers along with baseline AHI in a multivariate model classified more patients in the right MAS response group (69.2%) than a model based only on baseline AHI (50.0%) when the mandible was advanced by at least 4 mm. Conclusions Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improves MAS treatment response categorisation to a satisfactory level.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom