z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Exit strategy or exit trap? Basic income and the ‘power to say no’ in the age of precarious employment
Author(s) -
Simon Birnbaum,
Jürgen De Wispelaere
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
socio-economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.737
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1475-147X
pISSN - 1475-1461
DOI - 10.1093/ser/mwaa002
Subject(s) - disadvantaged , basic income , trap (plumbing) , cornerstone , position (finance) , labour economics , empowerment , power (physics) , exit strategy , economics , business , market economy , economic growth , engineering , finance , management , art , physics , quantum mechanics , environmental engineering , visual arts
An increasingly influential claim is that exit-based empowerment through an unconditional basic income offers the cornerstone of an effective strategy for supporting precarious workers in contemporary labor markets. However, it is plausible to assume that supporting the ‘power to say no’—to avoid or leave unattractive jobs—will empower precarious workers only to the extent that it offers the basis of a credible exit threat. In this article, we argue that a basic income-induced exit strategy amounts to a hollow threat. In light of a realistic understanding of how labor markets operate and how the opportunities of disadvantaged workers are presently structured, we show that the basic income-centered exit option can easily become an exit trap rather than an empowered fallback position.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom