z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Promissory ethical regimes: publics and public goods in genome editing for human health
Author(s) -
Matthias Wienroth,
Jackie Leach Scully
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
science and public policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1471-5430
pISSN - 0302-3427
DOI - 10.1093/scipol/scab052
Subject(s) - publics , beneficiary , corporate governance , genome editing , public relations , field (mathematics) , articulation (sociology) , dimension (graph theory) , public good , sociology , bioethics , political science , genome , politics , law , biology , economics , management , genetics , mathematics , pure mathematics , gene , microeconomics
This paper analyses promissory discourse for genome editing and human health in the UK, attending to the articulation of public goods and their beneficiary publics. Focusing on promissory reasoning about an emerging technology field as anticipatory and ethical considerations as integral to such debates, the notion of ethical regime as a mode of governance is applied to the concept of promissory regime. By analyzing key documents and interviews with opinion leaders—thus focusing on the discursive dimension—an enabling promissory ethical regime for genome editing and its contestation are identified. This regime posits scientific knowledge production now, and improved treatment or prevention of hereditary diseases later, as key goods of genome editing for human health and as a sociotechnical project worthy of support. Specific publics are created as beneficiaries. These publics and goods play out as ethical rationales for the promissory governance of the emerging field of human genome editing.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom