Methodological Consensus in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements: Workshop Contributions: The Assessment of Smooth Tracking Dysfunction
Author(s) -
William G. Iacono,
David T. Lykken
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
schizophrenia bulletin
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.823
H-Index - 190
eISSN - 1745-1701
pISSN - 0586-7614
DOI - 10.1093/schbul/9.1.44
Subject(s) - smooth pursuit , eye movement , eye tracking , electrooculography , artificial intelligence , psychology , function (biology) , computer science , computer vision , optometry , physical medicine and rehabilitation , medicine , evolutionary biology , biology
The two main techniques for recording eye movements, electro-oculography (EOG) and infrared reflection (IR), are discussed and compared. Methods of quantifying eye movement dysfunction are also reviewed and contrasted. It is concluded that EOG and IR recordings both contain information not present in the other and that both methods will continue to be useful. Similarly, although the root-mean-square (RMS) and the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) indices are algebraic functions of one another, the function is not linear and one or the other may be more appropriate to a particular application.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom