Do Shareholders Vote Strategically? Voting Behavior, Proposal Screening, and Majority Rules*
Author(s) -
Ernst Maug,
Kristian Rydqvist
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
european finance review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.933
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1573-692X
pISSN - 1382-6662
DOI - 10.1093/rof/rfn026
Subject(s) - shareholder , voting , benchmark (surveying) , cardinal voting systems , value (mathematics) , voting trust , majority rule , disapproval voting , simple (philosophy) , business , anti plurality voting , microeconomics , bullet voting , economics , computer science , actuarial science , artificial intelligence , political science , law , finance , corporate governance , machine learning , philosophy , geodesy , epistemology , politics , geography
We analyze how shareholders screen management proposals at annual general meetings. First, we use a simple model of strategic voting to develop a theoretical benchmark of effective information aggregation through voting. Then, we derive testable implications and provide structural estimates of the model parameters. The main conclusions are that shareholders vote strategically and that proposal screening increases value. Shareholders largely neutralize the lock-in effect of supermajority rules, thereby preventing the incorrect rejection of proposals. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom