z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Capital Structure and Dividend Irrelevance with Asymmetric Information
Author(s) -
Philip H. Dybvig,
Jaime F. Zender
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
review of financial studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.8
H-Index - 190
eISSN - 1465-7368
pISSN - 0893-9454
DOI - 10.1093/rfs/4.1.201
Subject(s) - dividend , incentive , economics , investment (military) , microeconomics , capital (architecture) , information asymmetry , capital structure , class (philosophy) , compensation (psychology) , information structure , miller , finance , computer science , debt , psychology , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , artificial intelligence , politics , biology , political science , psychoanalysis , law , history
The Modigliani and Miller propositions on the irrelevancy of capital structure and dividends are shown to be valid in a large class of models with asymmetric information. The main assumption is that managerial compensation is chosen optimally. This differs from most of the recent articles on this topic, which impose by fiat a suboptimal contract. Even when imperfections internal to the firm preclude optimal investment, there is a separation between incentives and financing. We conclude that corporations should move toward contracts with better incentives, and that new models should be built that recognize the limitations to optimal contracting. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom